New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Avadim Health Inc.

North Carolina-based Avadim Health Inc. and four affiliates (together, the “debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in the District of Delaware over the Memorial Day holiday. The “vertically integrated healthcare and wellness company” intends to “expeditiously complete a third-party sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets” to their pre-petition secured lenders (Hayfin Services LLP), who have agreed not only to serve as stalking horse purchaser but DIP lenders.

Historically, the debtors have sold topical products like pre-saturated towelettes, foaming, spray and other products B2B to acute care hospitals, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities. In 2016, nine years after their founding, the debtors expanded to B2C, unleashing their products in over 47k pharmacy locations and later adding its own website and an Amazon Inc. ($AMZN) presence to the mix. Between ‘17 and ‘19, the debtors’ annual net revenues popped from $10.8mm to $45.8mm.

On the liability side of the ledger, the debtors historically used debt, private placements of equity, convertible notes and revenues to fund ops. The capital structure includes:

  • $79.6mm term loan;

  • $22mm senior secured notes;

  • $6.4mm 6% unsecured convertible notes; and

  • $2.01mm 1% unsecured PPP loan due 4/22.

The company also owes $4.8mm pursuant to a settlement agreement tied to a patent dispute.

Remember those rising revenues? Yeah, well, that’s all fine and good unless it’s entirely offset by significant selling and marketing expenses and excess inventory build-up because not as many institutions want your product than you modeled out. This bit is brutal:

The Company’s sales related expenses resulted in limited free cash flow to fund other operating expenses, debt service, and investment in new products. In particular, the Company ramped up significant media/marketing expenditures and built up inventory in anticipation of its previously planned early 2020 IPO; however, that IPO never materialized.

Oh, wait, it gets worse:

Notwithstanding spending tens of millions of dollars over the past decade to build the Company’s brand, the Company has been unsuccessful in reaching profitability.

Ok, sorry, folks, but when we think of “brand” we think of LVMH, the parent company of luxury brands like Dior, Louis Vuitton, and Tiffany. In other words, a company with a market cap over 320b Euro which, earlier this month, made Bernard Arnault the richest person in the world (yes, over Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk). We DON’T think of “Theraworx Protect” (the debtors’ immune health line), Theraworx Protect U-Pak (the urinary health line) or Combat One (for soldier and first responder readiness). And we DEFINITELY don’t think of a company that lost $49.5mm $34.8mm and $53.6mm in ‘18, ‘19 and ‘20 respectively.

Apparently neither does the market. The IPO failed. Thereafter, the company initiated a strategic alternatives review that came up empty (with marketing taking place from March ‘20 through October ‘20 … poor timing). This is when the army of restructuring pros got involved, including independent directors on a “Restructuring Committee,” a CRO and some bankers for good measure. All roads, however, led back to the pre-petition secured lenders owed more than $102mm in principal amounts under the term loan and the secured notes. Apparently nobody else wanted to hop aboard a ship that (a) “[o]ver the past few years … [has] been perpetually distressed, constantly facing liquidity crunches and incurring defaults under the [term loan]” and (b) had to enter into “seven amendments to their [term loan] since June 2019, increasing the principal amount available to the Debtors, expanding interest obligations owed to the lenders, and extending maturities.

So, uh, why would anyone else want to get in on this?!?

As noted above, they don’t. The pre-petition lenders, on the other hand, are in a solid position to make a grab for valuable tax attributes and net operating losses!

MIDAVA HOLDINGS 3, INC. is the new entity formed by the pre-petition lenders to serve as stalking horse. The proposed DIP is $7.156mm at L+12%.

The debtors are represented by Chapman and Cutler LLP (Larry Halperin, Joon Hong) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Laura Davis Jones, David Bertenthal, Timothy Cairns) as legal counsel, Carl Marks Advisors (Keith Daniels) as financial advisor and CRO, SSG Capital Advisors LLC as banker and Omni Agent Solutions as claims agent. Hayfin is represented by Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (David Griffiths, Bryan Podzius, Rachael Foust) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Zachary Shapiro, Cavid Queroli).

The first day hearing is scheduled for later this morning at 11am ET.


Date: May 31, 2021

Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Goldblatt)

Capital Structure: see above

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Chapman and Cutler LLP (Larry Halperin, Joon Hong) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Laura Davis Jones, David Bertenthal, Timothy Cairns)

  • Board of Directors: Dewey Andrew, Linda McGoldrick, Charles Owen III, Steven Panagos, Karan Rai, James Rosati, Stephen Woody

  • Financial Advisor/CRO: Carl Marks Advisors (Keith Daniels)

  • Investment Banker: SSG Capital Advisors LLC

  • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • Term Loan Agent: Hayfin Services LLP

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (David Griffiths, Bryan Podzius, Rachael Foust) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Zachary Shapiro, Cavid Queroli)

👰🏾New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Occasion Brands LLC 👰🏾

Occasion Brands LLC

July 22, 2020

Occasion Brands LLC is owner and operator of three e-commerce properties that hock dresses for proms, homecomings, weddings, and other special occasions; it owns promgirl.com, simplydresses.com, and KleinfeldBridalParty.com. The company is owned by a lower middle market private equity shop called Milestone Partners. Thanks primarily to promgirl.com, the business generated gross revenue over $50mm in both ‘18 and ‘19.

TO READ THE REST OF THIS POST, YOU MUST BE A PETITION MEMBER. YOU CAN BECOME ONE HERE.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge Bernstein)

  • Capital Structure: $1.5mm of secured indebtedness via promissory notes (Milestone Partners), $2.5mm Allure promissory note, $1.325mm PPP (JPMorgan Chase Bank NA)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Sills Cummis & Gross PC (S. Jason Teele, Daniel Harris)

    • Financial Advisor: Insight Partners LLC (Robert Nolan)

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

🍣 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Sustainable Restaurant Holdings Inc. 🍣

Sustainable Restaurant Holdings Inc.

May 12, 2020

Portland-based Sustainable Restaurant Holdings Inc., the holding company behind ten environmentally-friendly restaurants under the Bamboo Sushi and Quickfish brands, filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. The company is owned by Kristofor Lofgren (42.1%) and supported by the Bain Capital Double Impact Fund LP (35.4%).

The company suffered, predictably, once COVID-19 struck and changed the business dynamic for restaurants all over the country. An attempted shift to take-out delivery wasn’t enough to drive revenue and shore up liquidity. The company makes no mention of any attempt to secure PPP funds pursuant to the CARES Act but, presumably, it wouldn’t have been eligible due to its connection to Bain. Bain, however, is stepping up to fund a $375k DIP that will fund the chapter 11 bankruptcy cases and hopefully buy the debtors time to locate a potential buyer of their assets.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: ~$1.5mm unsecured note

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP (Domenic Pacitti)

    • Independent Director: Pamela Corrie

    • Financial Advisor: Getzler Henrich & Associates LLC (David Campbell)

    • Investment Banker: SSG Capital Advisors LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Major Equityholder & DIP Lender ($375k): Bain Capital Double Impact Fund LP

👕 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Chinos Holdings Inc. (J.Crew) 👕

Chinos Holdings Inc. (J.Crew)

May 4, 2020

If you’re looking for a snapshot of the pre-trade war and pre-COVID US economy look no farther than J.Crew’s list of top 30 unsecured creditors attached to its chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. On the one hand there is the LONG list of sourcers, manufacturers and other middlemen who form the crux of J.Crew’s sh*tty product line: this includes, among others, 12 Hong Kong-based, three India-based, three South Korea-based, two Taiwan-based, and two Vietnam-based companies. In total, 87% of their product is sourced in Asia (45% from mainland China and 16% from Vietnam). On the other hand, there are the US-based companies. There’s Deloitte Consulting — owed a vicious $22.7mm — the poster child here for the services-dependent US economy. There’s the United Parcel Services Inc. ($UPS)…okay, whatever. You’ve gotta ship product. We get that. And then there’s Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, as the debtors’ pre-petition term loan agent, and Eaton Vance Management as a debtholder and litigant. Because nothing says the US-of-f*cking-A like debt and debtholder driven litigation. ‘Merica! F*ck Yeah!!

Chinos Holdings Inc. (aka J.Crew) and seventeen affiliated debtors (the “debtors”) filed for bankruptcy early Monday morning with a prearranged deal that is dramatically different from the deal the debtors (and especially the lenders) thought they had at the tail end of 2019. That’s right: while the debtors have obviously had fundamental issues for years, it was on the brink of a transaction that would have kept it out of court. Call it “The Petsmart Effect.” (PETITION Note: long story but after some savage asset-stripping the Chewy IPO basically dug out Petsmart from underneath its massive debt load; J.Crew’s ‘19 deal intended to do the same by separating out the various businesses from the Chino’s holding company and using Madewell IPO proceeds to fund payments to lenders).

Here is the debtors’ capital structure. It is key to understanding what (i) the 2019 deal was supposed to accomplish and (ii) the ownership of J.Crew will look like going forward:

Screen Shot 2020-05-04 at 3.38.16 PM.png

Late last year, the debtors and their lenders entered into a Transaction Support Agreement (“TSA”) with certain pre-petition lenders and their equity sponsors, TPG Capital LP and Leonard Green & Partners LP, that would have (a) swapped the $1.33b of term loans for $420mm of new term loans + cash and (b) left general unsecured creditors unimpaired (100% recovery of amounts owed). As noted above, the cash needed to make (a) and (b) happen would have come from a much-ballyhooed IPO of Madewell Inc.

Then COVID-19 happened.

Suffice it to say, IPO’ing a brick-and-mortar based retailer — even if there were any kind of IPO window — is a tall order when there’s, like, a pandemic shutting down all brick-and-mortar business. Indeed, the debtors indicate that they expect a $900mm revenue decline due to COVID. That’s the equivalent of taking Madewell — which earned $602m of revenue in ‘19 after $614mm in ‘18 — and blowing it to smithereens. Only then to go back and blow up the remnants a second time for good measure.* Source of funds exit stage left!

The post-COVID deal is obviously much different. The term lenders aren’t getting a paydown from Madewell proceeds any longer; rather, they are effectively getting Madewell itself by converting their term loan claims and secured note claims into approximately 82% of the reorganized equity. Some other highlights:

  • Those term loan holders who are members of the Ad Hoc Committee will backstop a $400mm DIP credit facility (50% minimum commitment) that will convert into $400mm of new term loans post-effective date. The entire plan is premised upon a $1.75b enterprise value which is…uh…interesting. Is it modest considering it represents a $1b haircut off the original take-private enterprise value nine years ago? Or is it ambitious considering the company’s obvious struggles, its limited brand equity, the recession, brick-and-mortar’s continued decline, Madewell’s deceleration, and so forth and so on? Time will tell.

  • Syndication of the DIP will be available to holders of term loans and IPCo Notes (more on these below), provided, however, that they are accredited institutional investors.

  • The extra juice for putting in for a DIP allocation is that, again, they convert to new term loans and, for their trouble, lenders of the new term loans will get 15% additional reorganized equity plus warrants. So an institution that’s in it to win it and has a full-on crush for Madewell (and the ghost of JCrew-past) will get a substantial chunk of the post-reorg equity (subject to dilution).

Query whether, if asked a mere six months ago, they were interested in owning this enterprise, the term lenders would’ve said ‘yes.’ Call us crazy but we suspect not. 😎

General unsecured creditors’ new deal ain’t so hot in comparison either. They went from being unimpaired to getting a $50mm pool with a 50% cap on claims. That is to say, maybe…maybe…they’ll get 50 cents on the dollar.

That is, unless they’re one of the debtors’ 140 landlords owed, in the aggregate, approximately $23mm in monthly lease obligations.** The debtors propose to treat them differently from other unsecured creditors and give them a “death trap” option: if they accept the TSA’s terms and get access to a $3mm pool or reject and get only $1mm with a 50% cap on claims. We can’t imagine this will sit well. We imagine that the debtors choice of venue selection has something to do with this proposed course of action. 🤔

We’re not going to get into the asset stripping transaction at the heart of the IPCo Note issuance. This has been widely-covered (and litigated) but we suspect it may get a new breath of life here (only to be squashed again, more likely than not). In anticipation thereof, the debtors have appointed special committees to investigate the validity of any claims related to the transaction. They may want to take up any dividends to their sponsors while they’re at it.

The debtors hope to have this deal wrapped up in a bow within 130 days. We cannot even imagine what the retail landscape will look like that far from now but, suffice it to say, the ratings agencies aren’t exactly painting a calming picture.

*****

*Curiously, there are some discrepancies here in the numbers. In the first day papers, the debtors indicate that 2018 revenue for Madewell was $529.2mm. With $602mm in ‘19 revenue, one certainly walks away with the picture that Madewell is a source of growth (13.8%) while the J.Crew side of the business continues to decline (-4%). This graph is included in the First Day Declaration:

Source: First Day Declaration

Source: First Day Declaration

The Madewell S-1, however, indicates that 2018 revenue was $614mm.

Screen Shot 2020-05-04 at 3.58.35 PM.png

With $268mm of the ‘18 revenue coming in the first half, this would imply that second half ‘18 revenue was $346mm. With ‘19 revenue coming in at $602mm and $333mm attributable to 1H, this would indicate that the business is declining rather than growing. In the second half, in particular, revenue for fiscal ‘19 was $269mm, a precipitous dropoff from $333mm in ‘18. Even if you take the full year fiscal year ‘18 numbers from the first day declaration (529.2 - 268) you get $261mm of second half growth in ‘18 compared to the $269mm in ‘19. While this would reflect some growth, it doesn’t exactly move the needle. This is cause for concern.

**To make matters worse for landlords, the debtors are also seeking authority to shirk post-petition rent obligations for 60 days while they evaluate whether to shed their leases. We get that the debtors were nearing a deal that COVID threw into flux, but this bit is puzzling: “Beginning in early April 2020, after several weeks of government mandated store closures and uncertainty as to the duration and resulting impact of the pandemic, the Debtors began to evaluate their lease portfolio to, among other things, quantify and realize the potential for lease savings.” Beginning in early April!?!?


  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of Virginia (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $311mm ABL (Bank of America NA), $1.34b ‘21 term loan (Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB), $347.6 IPCo Notes (U.S. Bank NA)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Ray Schrock, Ryan Preston Dahl, Candace Arthur, Daniel Gwen) & Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP (Tyler Brown, Henry P Long III, Nathan Kramer)

    • JCrew Opco Special Committee: D.J. (Jan) Baker, Chat Leat, Richard Feintuch, Seth Farbman

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP

    • Investment Banker: Lazard Freres & Co.

    • Real Estate Advisor: Hilco Real Estate LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Pre-petition ABL Agent: Bank of America NA

      • Legal: Choate Hall & Stewart LLP (Kevin Simard, G. Mark Edgarton) & McGuireWoods LLP (Douglas Foley, Sarah Boehm)

    • Pre-petition Term Loan & DIP Agent ($400mm): Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Seward & Kissel LLP

    • Ad Hoc Committee

      • Legal: Milbank LLP (Dennis Dunne, Samuel Khalil, Andrew LeBlanc, Matthew Brod) & Tavenner & Beran PLC (Lynn Tavenner, Paula Beran, David Tabakin)

      • Financial Advisor: PJT Partners Inc.

    • Large common and Series B preferred stock holders: TPG Capital LP (55% and 66.2%) & Leonard Green & Partners LP (20.7% and 24.8%)

      • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Paul Basta, Jacob Adlerstein, Eugene Park, Irene Blumberg) & Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP (Christopher Jones, Vernon Inge Jr., Corey Booker)

    • Large Series A preferred stock holders: Anchorage Capital Group LLC (25.6%), GSO Capital Partners LP (26.1%), Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (15.5%)

🏈New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - The Northwest Company LLC🏈

The Northwest Company LLC

April 19, 2020

It’s one thing to secure the account. It’s another thing to maintain it. If that account is Walmart Inc. ($WMT), you damn sure better make certain that the account is maintained. Enter The Northwest Company LLC. You may have purchased product from The Northwest Company LLC without ever knowing it: it is a manufacturer and seller of branded home textiles with a specialization in throws and blankets; it has multi-year license agreements with global entertainment and lifestyle brands and professionals sports leagues and sells its product through major national retailers (cough, Walmart) and online. If you’ve stopped at Walmart on the way to freezing your a$$ off while tailgating the Bears game, well, you may have picked up some Bears-branded Northwest-made blankets. Ah, sports. Remember those?

Unfortunately, The Northwest Company LLC and an affiliate are now chapter 11 debtors. They’ve been suffering from various issues dating back to 2017.

First, the debtors acquired the sports-branded inventory of Concept One, a leading manufacturer of licensed backpacks and accessories sold primarily through Walmart Inc. ($WMT). Well, someone effed up. The debtors quickly discovered quality control “[c]hallenges with the acquired inventory” shortly after the deal closed. Consequently, the debtors didn’t make as much money from the product as modeled. All the while, the debtors were still on the hook for license payments. Rut roh. Lower than expected inputs + static outputs means that someone’s model got blown to sh*t. To make matters worse, certain product was so shoddy that Walmart reduced and subsequently cancelled the debtors’ participation in its juvenile bedding modular program. The bankruptcy papers don’t say but we have to think, on a volume basis alone, losing the Walmart juvenile bedding account was a major blow.

Enter President Trump. The trade war led to a 25% tariff on bags and backpacks imported from China. “The tariff was in addition to the already high 17.6% duty imposed on that category of goods, and decreased both demand for the goods and the margins on their sale.” Yikes. We wonder who these folks are voting for come November.

The debtors also blame general retail sector woes — as one might expect. Finally, they acknowledge COVID-19, saying it “exacerbated” their financial condition, but note that was “not the reason for the … bankruptcy.” Honestly, that’s somewhat shocking given that the NBA suspended as the playoffs neared and the MLB season never even got off the ground. Most of the major sports leagues are top creditors. The debtors owe $57mm in trade debt.

To finance their cases and pursue a sale, the debtors seek to enter into a post-petition financing agreement with their pre-petition lender, CIT Group, which appears over-secured by 2x.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $19.1mm pre-petition factoring obligations (CIT Group/Commercial Services Inc.), $10mm promissory note (Ashford Textiles LLC)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Sills Cummis & Gross P.C. (S. Jason Teele, Gregory Kopacz)

    • Financial Advisor: Clear Thinking Group LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • CIT Group/Commercial Services Inc.

🛰New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - OneWeb Global Limited🛰

OneWeb Global Limited

March 27, 2020

We have been complaining for months about how bankruptcy was getting boring. There are only so many retail, oil and gas, biopharma or mass tort cases to write about before things start to get really … and we mean REALLY … monotonous. And so a shout out to Softbank’s Masa Son: as always, you’ve supplied some much needed novelty to the mix! Amidst countless stories of one Softbank portfolio company after another getting a new directive, fresh discipline or retraded on deals (cough, WeWork), portfolio company OneWeb Global Limited and eighteen affiliates (the “debtors”) filed for bankruptcy.

As far as Softbank investments go, the debtors are SOOOOOOOO on brand. It is almost literally a “moonshot,” an uber-ambitious project aiming to deploy “the world’s first global satellite communications network to deliver high-throughput, high-speed, low-latency Internet connectivity services, having an ability of channeling 50 megabits per second, with a latency of less than 50 millisecond, and capable of connecting everywhere, to everyone.” Since 2012, the debtors have been developing a low-Earth orbit satellite constellation system and associated ground infrastructure “capable of delivering communication services for use by consumers, businesses, governmental entities, and institutions, including schools, hospitals, and other end-users whether on the ground, in the air, or at sea.” This means they have started mass producing small satellites, acquiring various authorizations and spectrum icenses (i.e., the use of Ku-band and Ka-band radio-frequency spectrum on a global basis) and domestic market access/services authorizations; they have also completed three launches of 70 satellites in the last year. “OneWeb was well on its way to growing its constellation to 648 satellites with the goal of beginning customer service demonstrations in late 2020 and providing full global commercial coverage by late 2021 or early 2022.” Right. Just like Uber Inc. ($UBER) is delivering autonomous cars and WeWork is sustainably spreading its community-first mission across the world. You have to hand it to Masa Son: the man has some vision. Some entrepreneurial spirit. Eventually, though, there has to be money to support the ambition.

Right. So, about the money. The debtors have raised a lot of it — no surprise considering the capital intensive nature of the business. The raises include:

  • A $500mm equity raise backed by Airbus Group Inc. Hughes Network Systems LLC, Intelsat Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated and Virgin Group Ltd.

  • A $1.2b equity raise, $1b of which came from Softbank Group Corp. and the other $200mm from existing investors.

  • A $408mm note issuance to Softbank as administrative and collateral agent.

  • A $1.56b senior note issuance (and corresponding warrant issue) secured by substantially all of the debtors’ assets including share pledges and rights to radiofrequency authorizations. This issuance rolled-up the $408mm note.

In total, the debtors has over $1.73b in funded debt outstanding as of the petition date on top of the $1.7b of equity raised.

And yet it is in bankruptcy first and foremost because of liquidity issues. As a development stage company, it is what the venture capitalists would call “pre-revenue.” Worse than that, development is time-consuming and expensive and the build out of the debtors’ systems “exhausted [their] existing equity and debt financing.” Again, this is Softbank: massive cash burn is part of its playbook. We’ve all seen this movie before. There’s always tons of money until — poof! — suddenly there’s not. Since 2019, the debtors have been seeking investments from existing and new investors but nobody would bite. It seems that investors hesitated to throw good money after bad; it is also safe to presume that, by this point, a certain level of post-WeWork-fiasco Softbank taint burdened the process. Investors are leery of lighting good money on fire after bad.

Toss in COVID-19 and we’ve got ourselves a combustible situation. Per the debtors:

OneWeb had been hopeful to achieve an out of court solution to its deteriorating liquidity position. After several due diligence meetings during the first and second weeks of March 2020, the Company believed that it was going to be able to secure a long-term funding arrangement from existing shareholders. However, on March 12, 2020, as the markets began to feel the impact of COVID-19, OneWeb was notified that its current investors would not commit to a long term solution. On March 16, 2020, OneWeb entered into a term sheet for bridge financing to be consummated by March 26, 2020. On March 21, 2020, the Company was notified that the bridge financing offer was unavailable. Unfortunately, the anticipated funding opportunities OneWeb pursued were significantly and precipitously impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shuttering of the global economy. OneWeb, in an effort to preserve liquidity during these difficult social, political, and economic times, began shutting down nonessential aspects of its business in order to preserve the value of its existing assets.

Consequently, the debtors laid off 90% of their workforce and halted development. With the consensual use of Softbank’s cash collateral, the debtors filed chapter 11 “to provide them with the necessary breathing space to wait-out the current instability of the financial markets as they respond to COVID-19 pandemic and to adequately market and monetize their assets.

Given the volatility currently in the market, there’s no telling how long they’ll have to wait.


  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: see above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Milbank LLP (Dennis Dunne, William Schumacher, Andrew Leblanc, Tyson Lomazow, Lauren Doyle)

    • Financial Advisor: FTI Consulting Inc.

    • Investment Banker: Guggenheim Securities LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Softbank

      • Legal: Morrison & Foerster LLP (Gary Lee, Todd Goren)

    • Collateral Agent: GLAS

      • Legal: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer (Jonathan Levine)

    • EchoStar Operating LLC and Hughes Network Systems LLC

      • Legal: White & Case LLP (Thomas Lauria, Harrison Denman, John Ramirez)

    • Airbus DS Satnet LLC and Airbus Group Proj B.V.

      • Legal: Hogan Lovells US LLP (Ronald Silverman, Christopher Bryant, M. Hampton Foushee, Craig Ulman)

🍿New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - VIP Cinema Holdings Inc.🍿

VIP Cinema Holdings Inc.

February 18, 2020

VIP Cinema Holdings Inc. and four affiliates (the “debtors”) filed prepackaged chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in the District of Delaware; they are manufacturers of luxury seating products for movie theaters. Here’s the problem: end user customers stopped ordering their stuff. Yup, that’s right, there’s a finite market for luxury seating in movie theaters. Who knew?

Here are some of the problems this company confronted:

  • They made chairs that were too good. That’s right. Too good. The chairs had a longer lifecycle than the company likely wanted. Either that or people are engaging in too much Netflixing and chilling and not enough movie-going.

  • Movie theaters slowed down their renovation activities and construction of new locations. Perhaps people are engaging in too much Netflixing and chilling and not enough movie-going.

  • Movie theaters reduced capital investment — mostly because they haven’t exactly performed very well themselves and have their own debt and equityholders to contend with. Also, people are engaging in too much Netflixing and chilling and not enough movie-going.

  • They conquered the total addressable market, securing 70% market share with little to no room to grow thanks to all of the foregoing bulletpoints.

Are we being too flip about $NFLX? Well, don’t take our word for it. Here’s the company explaining one of the reasons why it’s in trouble:

“Continued proliferation of online streaming services and alternative viewing experiences, which has led to declining movie attendance, a poor outlook sentiment for the overall U.S. movie theatre industry and particularly put significant pressure on the stock price of AMC, a key customer for the Company.”

Because of all of the foregoing factors, the debtors triggered an event of default under their first lien credit agreement and have been in a state of forbearance with their lenders ever since — all with the hope of negotiating an out-of-court restructuring transaction.

That hope was extinguished when Odeon reduced seating orders, napalming everyone’s financial models upon which the proposed out-of-court transaction was premised. Now we’re in prepackaged bankruptcy territory with a restructuring support agreement that will shed $178mm of debt and infuses the company with a $33mm DIP credit facility — of which $13mm is new money and $20mm is a roll-up of prepetition debt. Here is the pre-petition capital structure:

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 8.52.34 PM.png

The liquidity is highly necessary. The debtors are burning cash like Rick Dalton burns interlopers bursting into his Hollywood Hills mansion. The debtors filed for bankruptcy with just $1mm in liquidity remaining.

Speaking of burning cash, that’s pretty much what you can say about the $200-or-so-million that previously went into these debtors. The restructuring support agreement will (a) convert first lien loans to preferred and common equity, (b) donut the second lien claims, and (c) donut the general unsecured claimants (unless they opt-in to a release, in which case they’ll get $5k). Critical to everything is the fact that HIG Capital LLC, the existing shareholder in the company, will write a new-money check of $7mm and enter in a management services agreement with the reorganized newco. In exchange for this investment, HIG will get preferred equity and 51% of the common equity.* Everyone is going to be holding their breath for the next 6 weeks, hoping that no other large chains cancel or downsize orders. If that happens, this deal could blow up.

*Suffering PTSD from the last-minute collapse of the out-of-court deal, HIG also negotiated the ability to walk if the debtors have less than $1.5mm of available unrestricted cash on the “Exit Date.”


  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

  • Capital Structure: see above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Ropes & Gray LLP (Gregg Galardi, Christine Pirro Schwarzman) & Bayard PA (Erin Fay, Daniel Brogan, Gregory Flasser)

    • Independent Director: Michael Foreman

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: AlixPartners LLP (Stephen Spitzer)

    • Investment Banker: UBS Securities LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions Inc. (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • First Lien Agent: Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (Andrew Goldman, Benjamin Loveland) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Robert Dehney, Joseph Barsalona II, Tamara Mann, Andrew Workman)

    • Ad Hoc Group of First Lien Lenders

      • Legal: Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (Damian Schaible, Adam Shpeen) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Robert Dehney, Joseph Barsalona II, Tamara Mann, Andrew Workman)

      • Financial Advisor: M-III Partners LP

    • Second Lien Agent & Second Lien Lenders: Oaktree Fund Administration LLC

      • Legal: Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP (Jayme Goldstein, Daniel Ginsburg, Joanne Lau) and Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Matthew Lunn, Edmon Morton, Betsy Feldman)

    • Sponsor: HIG Capital LLC & HIG Middle Market LBO Fund II LP

      • Legal: McDermott Will & Emery LLP (Brooks Gruemmer, Jay Kapp)

👦🏻New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Boy Scouts of America👦🏻

Boy Scouts of America

February 18, 2020

It’s a sad state of affairs when mass tort cases overrun the bankruptcy system. Between a recent deluge of asbestos cases (e.g., ON Marine Services Company LLC, Paddock Enterprises LLC, and DBMP LLC), opioid cases (e.g., Purdue Pharma, Insys Therapeutics), global warming and negligence cases (PG&E) and sexual abuse cases (e.g., USA Gymnastics, one diocese after another), Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz is correct to declare “A New Era of Mass Tort Bankruptcies” in a recent client report. They recently wrote:

The use of the bankruptcy process to address mass tort liability reflects a growing recognition that chapter 11, while imperfect, provides tools for dispute resolution that are not generally available in federal or state courts.

And:

For companies that have insufficient assets to pay claims in full, bankruptcy ensures that the debtor’s limited assets are distributed equitably among claimants, including “future” claimants (those whose claims have not yet manifested). Chapter 11 can allow companies with tort liabilities to maintain operations, thereby continuing to generate funds to make payments over time, while providing a respite from defending lawsuits and a platform to negotiate settlements. Bankruptcy also provides a mechanism for centralizing the resolution of large numbers of tort claims, including through a court estimation of the aggregate liability, greatly reducing litigation costs and increasing the potential for a global settlement.

The purposes of these filings?

The wave of asbestos-related bankruptcies in the 1980s led Congress to enact Bankruptcy Code provisions to facilitate reorganization of debtors facing asbestos claims by establishing a plaintiffs’ trust funded by cash, proceeds of insurance policies, and equity in the reorganized debtor. In exchange for contributing to the trust, the debtor and other contributors receive a “channeling injunction,” which “channels” all existing and future claims to the trust. Upon resolution of the bankruptcy, such claims are brought against and paid by the trust, the debtor is discharged, and other contributors are released from further liability. While the relevant Bankruptcy Code provisions apply by their terms only to asbestos-related claims, similar mechanisms have been used (or are currently contemplated) in the bankruptcies of Takata (defective airbags), Pacific Gas & Electric (wildfire damages), and several Catholic dioceses (abuse claims).

Enter Sidley Austin LLP here. Sidley Austin is widely-credited for the notion that a channeling injunction could be deployed in the Takata chapter 11 case. It’s no wonder, then, that they’d land another major mass tort case and deploy the same playbook. Boy Scouts are well-accustomed to playbooks.

And deploy the playbook, they will.

The Boy Scouts of America are involved in 275 lawsuits currently pending in state and federal courts across the United States. They are also aware of an additional 1,400 claims that have not yet filed. Recently enacted legislation that extended the statute of limitations — passed in 17 states, including 12 in 2019 — led to a deluge of additional recently filed suits against the BSA. Consequently, the BSA spent more than $150mm on settlements and legal costs from 2017 through 2019 alone. Compounding matters, membership and donations are on the decline. BSA registered membership is down 500k since 2012. People are dropping the Boy Scouts HARD.

The BSA has filed a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement along with their customary first day papers. Where the rubber will meet the road is at the asset level. Per the BSA:

…attorneys for abuse victims believed that certain Local Councils with significant abuse liabilities have significant assets that could be used to compensate victims.

The Local Councils, however, are not debtors. There is, though, an ad hoc committee of Local Councils, the purpose of which is to allow the Local Councils to participate in negotiations about a global resolution of abuse claims. The Local Councils share insurance with the BSA and insurance, naturally, will be a huge source of recovery for abuse claimants. Claimants will also want to understand whether Local Councils are being used to shield assets from attack — a strategy exposed in this recent Wall Street Journal piece. This issue appears to be key to the bankruptcy and any potential resolution. The volunteer chair of the Local Council Committee? Richard Mason of Wachtell. Forgot to mention that one in the aforementioned client alert.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure: $328mm secured debt (see below)(JPMorgan)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Sidley Austin LLP (Jessica Boelter, Alex Rovira, Andrew Propps, James Conlan, Thomas Labuda, Michael Andolina, Matthew Linder) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC (Brian Whittman)

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

Source: Disclosure Statement

Source: Disclosure Statement

🍎New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Lucky's Market Parent Company LLC🍎

Lucky's Market Parent Company LLC

January 27, 2020

In Sunday’s Members’-only a$$-kicking briefing entitled “🔥Like No Other Newsletter🔥,” we took a deeeeeeeeep dive into the Fairway Group Holdings Corp. chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. We relegated to a mere footnote, the following:

*Two more local grocers to watch out for: Lucky’s Market (not PE-backed) and Earthfare (PE-backed). The former announced, on the heals of losing its sponsorship from Kroger Inc., that it would close 32 of 39 stores. The latter is quietly shuttering stores (e.g., Gainesville and Indianapolis). This is telling:

“Stern said Lucky's could potentially be acquired, but he said logical choices like Sprouts Farmers Market and The Fresh Market are also retrenching and not in expansion mode right now.”

The pain in grocery is pervasive.

Lucky’s Market Parent Company LLC be like:

Dirty Dancing.gif

And so the Colorado-based company and 21 affiliated entities filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. Because, like, f*ck it: the pain in grocery IS pervasive so it might as well become a chapter 11 debtor like everyone else.

This one swims upstream. The debtors focus on affordable organic and locally-grown produce, naturally raised meats and seafood, and fresh daily prepared foods. Which, we thought, was supposed to be all the rage. “Organic for the 99%” was their mission. They even have private label goods. AND they have a millennial-pleasing “giving” element to their business: 10% of profits from private label sales are reinvested into the local communities they service. They have no unions. And they’re not even private equity owned!! Kroger Inc. ($KR) is the debtors’ secured lender and largest equity holder and, while obviously not PE bros, it seems that maybe(?) Kroger pushed the Colorado-based founders to grow too fast too soon?? In the midst of a number of grocery bankruptcies. In April 2016, they had 17 stores. The Kroger transaction took place at that time and then — BOOM! — a private equity growth mentality appears to have mysteriously overtaken the debtors. By the end of that year, the debtors’ footprint was up to 20 stores; by the end of 2017, it was 26 stores; 33 stores by the end of 2018; and 39 stores by the end of 2019. Florida was a primary focus.

The timing was pretty bad. Per the debtors:

…the Company’s expansion in Florida coincided with, among other things, increased competition in the grocery industry, including expansions from competing chains such as Sprouts Farmers Market, Fresh Thyme Farmers Market and Earth Fare. As a result, notwithstanding the growth in sales, the portfolio of Company stores was unable to achieve sustainable four-wall profitability.

Note the mention of Earth Fare ⬆️. Get ready for Dirty Dancing 2: Havana Nights gifs, people.

There’s more:

Most recently, fiscal year-to-date through January 4, 2020, the Company had approximately $22 million of store operating losses and approximately $100 million net loss. Additionally, fiscal year-to-date through the week ended January 18, 2020, the Company had a 10.6% reduction in comparable store sales versus the prior year-to-date period.

Suffice it to say, that growth strategy diiiiiiiidn’t work out so well.

Captain Obvious.gif

And so now it’s all being unwound. The debtors began winding down 32 of their 39 stores pre-petition and, obviously, terminated plans for 19 leased but unopened locations.

Screen Shot 2020-01-27 at 7.48.03 PM.png

Absent closure, the debtors note, they’d be on the hook for $30mm in operating losses for fiscal year ‘20. Now they’re selling furniture, fixtures and equipment from, and transferring leases of, 26 stores to third-party purchasers. They have an asset purchase agreement with Aldi for six FL locations while they continue to operate 7 locations while the marketing process progresses.

The debtors will use Kroger’s cash collateral to fund these cases.

  • Jurisdiction: (Judge Dorsey)

  • Capital Structure: $301.1mm secured loan (Kroger Inc.), $5.9mm New Markets Tax Credit Loan (BBIF Subsidiary CDE 3 LLC, guaranteed by Kroger Inc.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Polsinelli PC (Christopher Ward, Liz Boydston, Caryn Wang)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: Peter J. Solomon

    • Liquidation Consultant: Great American Global Partners LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

    • Independent Director: William Transier

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Large Equityholder (55%): Kroger Inc.

      • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Garrett Fail, Moshe Fink) and Richards Layton & Finger PA (Zachary Shapiro, Brett Haywood)

📜New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - SFP Franchise Corp. (aka Papyrus)📜

SFP Franchise Corp.

January 23, 2010

Just last week someone from the PETITION team needed to get a card commemorating a family occasion and checked out the Papyrus store in Grand Central Station. It was jam-packed. She then went on to spent $7.99 on a frikken card — something that, it seems, was just $2.99 a few years ago. We suppose there’s a $4 premium for cards that look hand-created yet are mass-produced. Whatever. Anyway, inflation notwithstanding, Tennessee-based SFP Franchise Corp. and its affiliate Schurman Fine Papers filed for bankruptcy this week. Sure, sure, they sell $7.99 cards but at the time of filing, the debtors were down to their last $32k. 😬

This is NOT a story about disruption in the way some might expect. No, electronic cards that literally NOBODY ON THE PLANET OPENS did not destroy this business. At least significantly enough for the company to acknowledge it as a factor. People still dig physical acknowledgements. Instead, this is a story about over-expansion, poor timing, bad deals and over-reliance on one counterparty. In this case, American Greetings Corporation.

The debtors started in 1950 as a greeting card and stationary wholesaler. They expanded into franchise, retail and online over time and the expansion brought on some pain in 2008-2009 (shortly after the company re-purchased franchises). At that time, the debtors engaged with American Greetings as a strategic partner. The debtors sold American Greetings their wholesale business and brand and related trademarks. In turn, the debtors acquired the retail business previously operated by American Greetings — both in the US and Canada (PETITION Note: if you’re thinking, “I thought that brand and trademarks are really the only thing of value for retailers today, well, you’re not wrong.”). Score one for American Greetings here: it dumped its brick-and-mortar retail on the debtors right before the retail sh*tstorm hit. 👍

The deal is special in retrospect. American Greetings agreed to (i) supply the debtors product for an initial term of 7 years, and (ii) provide a royalty-free license of the trademarks for 10 years. In exchange, the debtors agreed to (i) provide fee-generating marketing services for 7 years and (ii) collect and provide point-of-sale data to American Greetings for an initial term of 7 years (for a fee). In essence, the debtors didn’t own or control the product and didn’t own or control the intellectual property. Said another way, this business was dead in 2009: the debtors just didn’t know it yet.

Well, it’s now 2020 and the debtors are, in fact, officially dead. American Greetings pulled the plug in December when it notified the debtors that it was terminating the agreements (citing default under the agreements). Instantaneously, the debtors lost access to product which, in turn, affected revenues.

All 254 stores in the US (178) and Canada (76) will close. 1,100 people are going to need to find new jobs. Trade creditors owed approximately $8mm are essentially screwed. And there will now be more empty boxes in malls. The ramifications of a liquidating retailer cannot be overstated.

The debtors will seek permission to use cash collateral to conduct, with the assistance of Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC and Hilco Merchant Resources LLC, an orderly liquidation under chapter 11.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $6.675mm RCF (Wells Fargo Bank NA), $10mm LOC (PNC Bank NA), $38.7mm subordinated debt (AG, Carlton Cards Limited, Papyrus-Recycled Greetings Canada Ltd.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Landis Rath & Cobb LLP (Adam Landis, Matthew McGuire, Nicolas Jenner)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Mackinac Partners LLC (Craig Boucher)

    • Liquidation Consultant: Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC & Hilco Merchant Resources LLC

      • Legal: Greenberg Traurig LLP (Jeffrey Wolf, Dennis Meloro)

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition Agent: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Donald Rothman, Steven Fox, Anthony Stumbo, Paul Bekker) & Womble Bond Dickinson US LLP (Matthew Ward, Morgan Patterson)

    • Subordinated Creditor: American Greetings Corporation

      • Legal: Baker & Hostetler LLP (Michael VanNiel, Adam Fletcher) & Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP (John Demmy)